According to @ItsDave_ADA, only Bitcoin (BTC), Cardano (ADA), and XRP in the top 10 have a hard supply cap and thus fixed digital scarcity, while Solana (SOL) is inflationary, implying capped assets can compound value as demand rises. Source: https://twitter.com/ItsDave_ADA/status/1966946060598935669 Bitcoin’s supply is hard-capped at 21 million with programmed halvings that cut new issuance roughly every four years, limiting structural dilution. Source: https://bitcoin.org/en/faq Cardano’s ADA has a fixed maximum supply of 45 billion, with staking rewards emitted from reserves until the cap is reached, reinforcing a capped-supply profile. Source: https://iohk.io/en/blog/posts/2020/08/13/the-monetary-policy-of-cardano/ XRP’s total supply was created at genesis at 100 billion and cannot be increased, with small reductions from transaction-fee burns, confirming a non-inflationary supply. Source: https://xrpl.org/xrp.html Solana employs an inflation schedule that started near 8% annually and decays by 15% per year toward a long-term 1.5% rate, indicating no hard cap. Source: https://docs.solana.com/cluster/inflation However, BNB also enforces a maximum supply of 200 million with ongoing auto-burns targeting a 100 million terminal supply, so capped-supply designs extend beyond BTC, ADA, and XRP. Source: https://www.binance.com/en/bnb Trading takeaway: capped-supply assets reduce dilution from new issuance, but circulating float still changes via mechanisms like ADA reserve emissions and XRP escrow releases, which can affect short-term supply overhang and price elasticity. Source: https://iohk.io/en/blog/posts/2020/08/13/the-monetary-policy-of-cardano/ and https://ripple.com/insights/quarterly-xrp-markets-reports/

According to @adriannewman21, labeling a token as 100% circulating on day one can be financial engineering that concentrates supply among a few holders and misleads retail traders, source: @adriannewman21 on X, September 1, 2025. According to @adriannewman21, a low float with a high fully diluted valuation (FDV) directly signals the team will control the majority of supply, indicating centralization risk at launch, source: @adriannewman21 on X, September 1, 2025. According to @adriannewman21, traders should treat low-float, high-FDV launches as red flags when evaluating new listings, source: @adriannewman21 on X, September 1, 2025.

According to @secondswap_io, the headline 16.27% unlock overstates near-term float because at TGE only 20% of the presale allocation unlocks and the presale equals 25% of total supply, yielding just 5% of total supply available in the short term (source: @secondswap_io on X, Sep 1, 2025). This means initial circulating supply expansion at TGE should be modeled at 5% rather than 16.27% for float-based trading calculations and liquidity planning (source: @secondswap_io on X, Sep 1, 2025).

According to @EmberCN, OKX will burn 65,256,712 OKB on August 15, reducing the token’s total supply to 21 million. Source: @EmberCN. OKB previously had a total supply of 300 million, with 28 burns since May 2019 that cumulatively destroyed 213,743,286 OKB, and the planned burn would bring cumulative destroyed tokens to about 278 million. Source: @EmberCN. OKB rose on the announcement, indicating an immediate positive market reaction relevant for traders monitoring exchange token flows. Source: @EmberCN.

According to @Excellion, he publicly criticized the idea of a 70% premine, signaling strong skepticism toward tokens with such distributions and underscoring premine size as a risk factor to watch; no specific asset was named in the post. Source: Samson Mow (@Excellion) on X, Aug 11, 2025.